I thought it would be easy to find evidence of my marriage
in Maine. I was mistaken. I wasn’t surprised, assuming that a small town in
Maine may not have reported the marriage of an out-of-stater. I decided to
change the details of my search, using my birthday and place of birth. Again,
there is no evidence of my birth. I tried searching using my parents’ names and
still found nothing. Perhaps being born in a territory rather than a state
makes a difference. I changed that—still no hit. Frustrated, I give up.
Finding my grandfather in the 1900 census is much easier
even though I have much less information. I only enter his name and place of
birth (I remember the town incorrectly but the state is correct). I am given
several “relevant” choices but I
remember my great-grandmother’s first name so know which record to go to. The handwritten
census report is difficult to read—but I find my grandfather (1 year old in
1900) and his siblings and parents in the census ledger. The manner in which
the original record is displayed—right in the middle of the page—simplifies the
search.
Going to Photos and Maps and looking at Maine, I discovered
that there are few maps for the years I select. In fact, there is one image for
each of the years I select from the list. One is of the Eagle Lake area, the
other is a state map of Maine. When I go to the photos, I decide to look at
Civil War images. There are in fact many photos of soldiers from Maine. I don’t
know if any of my Maine ancestors fought in the Civil War but decide to search
for information. I don’t find any matches. The photos are compelling. I wish I
had more time to look at more of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment